IMDG Code
The
definition of “Dangerous Goods”, and the conditions for their carriage,
are laid down in maritime law by the International Maritime Dangerous
Goods (IMDG) Code. The number of different items which could fall under
the umbrella definition of “Dangerous Goods” means that there are nine
different classes of item with provision under the Code, and in each of
these classes there are then a number of sub-classes, which may differ
in levels of danger, in what it takes for the item to become dangerous
and other factors.
Classification of Dangerous Goods
The classes of dangerous substance are numbered, one to nine, and the list is as follows:
- Explosives
- Gases
- Flammable liquids
- Flammable solids
- Oxidising substances
- Toxic and infectious substances
- Radioactive materials
- Corrosive substances
- Miscellaneous dangerous substances and articles.
Hague-Visby Rules
Liability
for the carriage of goods by sea is covered by the Hague-Visby rules
under the “International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules
of Law relating to Bills of Lading”. These rules were drafted in 1924,
amended under the Visby Amendments in 1968, and finalised in 1979. The
Hague-Visby Rules make clear that, where goods being transported fall
under the IMDG code as dangerous goods, the carrier is responsible for
making the ship seaworthy, staffing it correctly and providing for its
safe carriage.
For the shipper’s part, it
is essential that they make the carrier aware before a journey that
items being transported fall into one of the nine orders laid down in
the IMDG. Failure to do this will result in the goods being either
ejected from the ship at the first safe place, or being made safe (and
possibly therefore useless) by the carrier, without the shipper being
entitled to compensation. Indeed, any action that needs to be taken in
the circumstances will be billed to the shipper of such goods, whether
the action relates directly or indirectly to the carriage. In short, it
is vital that if a shipper wishes to transport goods that may in any
circumstances pose a danger to the health of passengers or the safety of
the journey, they alert the carrier before such goods are laden.
Failure to do so will result in punishment on as many fronts as are
relevant, and see the shipper much worse off than if they were to pay
the premium for safe shipping up front.
No comments:
Post a Comment